I tried other programs and every time I did come back to Lightroom. Overall more natural than the OOC's (which is no little feat I think). CO did a wonderful job bringing those to live: sharper than OOC, but also a bit more noise (after all a choice). I had some raw pictures taken at ISO 6400. It has a nice profile for Velvia like processing as well. I used Iridient, which can do some beautiful things, especially for low ISO/low noise pictures. I decided to abandon Adobe because my 'eternal license' for CS6 was cancelled (some issues with the provider I bought it from). Very fine details and foliage are still rendered best by Silkypix and Photo Ninja but with a bit more noise. However, I find that Photo Ninja is better for landscapes where there is lots of greenery to be rendered.Īdobe Lightroom (current version) is now good enough for 99% of RAW images from Fuji cameras. LR5.5 has Fuji film simulations built-in to the Camera Calibration tab which produce excellent results in most circumstances. ![]() So I guess its Capture one for now until something better comes along Photo Nija does a reasonable job but is limited. I dont like how LR5.3 reders the file and ACR is not much better. I've just the Fuji bandwagon and coming from Nikon its a bit disappointing to see a good raw converter like DXO pro not support the x-trans sensor. I have also used noise ninja and its good, but I prefer my workflow of LR and PS. I do notice that there are issues with pink saturation sometimes on certain shots, but nothing a little local adjustment brush cant fix. Honestly at first, I thought my lightroom 5 was doing a horrible job converting them, but after a while, I really like it. ![]() I downloaded Adobe DNG converter and then jsut run through lightroom 3 :)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |